|
Position Statement of the AFA

Concerning the re-introduction & release of
birds which have been held in captivity:
The AFA acknowledges
that re-introduction of particular avian species may be considered as
a conservation measure vital to the ultimate survival of that species.
The AFA promotes and
supports re-introduction programs which utilize birds previously held
in captivity with the following stipulations:
-
that the
re-introduction program must have the full and complete approval
of the appropriate authorities within the country(s) of
origin/destination, including but not limited to, the country(s)
of origin/destination’s federal conservation authority;
-
and finally, that
habitat and environment for the species under study must be
maintained in a fashion consistent with accepted practices of
conservation management by the country(s) of origin/destination or
agent(s) thereof, and that continued monitoring of the population
be perpetually conducted by the appropriate scientific authority
to ensure the continued propagation of the population under
scrutiny.
The AFA does not
support the release of any birds which have been held in captivity,
unless these birds have been constantly maintained under strict
measures of biosecurity that would ensure that these birds would not
have been exposed to any known or unknown infectious pathogens.
The AFA does not
support the release of any birds which have been held in captivity,
unless these birds have been properly socialized and conditioned for
survival and integration as established by accepted practices of
conservation biology.
The AFA strongly feels
that the conservation of habitat and proper wildlife management
practices are preferable to any re-introduction program, and that such
re-introduction programs should be considered only as measures of last
resort for the survival of the species.

|